Play Digital Fishers Now
Developed by NEPTUNE Canada with the University of Victoria’s Centre for Global Studies (CFGS) and funded by CANARIE. Co-investigator Dr. Rod Dobell leads the involvement of CfGS with additional support from eBriefings.ca.
Drowning in Video
Over our first two years of operations, NEPTUNE Canada has recorded thousands of hours of video, both during installation dives and from underwater cameras installed across our subsea network. All this video needs to be studied, but our software has not (yet) become sophisticated enough to automatically identify a wide variety of animals and other features. So the video needs to be reviewed by human eyes, but it’s a daunting task for scientists to watch so much footage and describe what they see – this is where you can help.
How to Play
Becoming a Digital Fisher is easy. Simply visit the Digital Fishers website, and watch a short 15 second segment of video. As you view various animals and your surroundings, you can describe what you see by selecting from the fields below the video screen. These fields include: sea life, water clarity, seafloor composition, and any other objects you see (natural or human made). There is also a comment field where you can add more information. Your “annotation” then gets attached to that segment back at the NEPTUNE Canada database.
The easy-to-use interface resembles (a bit!) the dashboard of a research submarine to give you the feeling of cruising about the ocean as you explore it from your computer. The cool part is you get to play a game and see interesting videos of our ocean, all while contributing to the scientific community. In other words, your annotation adds value to the raw video data and provides assistance to scientific users of the database. With a lot of visitors, each of the segments can be viewed more than once to make sure multiple people see the same thing, nothing gets missed, and researchers have a pretty good idea of what is found in that video.
There are five levels and in order to progress through the levels you have to complete a certain number of annotations (tags or descriptions) in order to gain creature feature cards. These cards tell you about an animal that lives in the ocean, which you may or may not see during gameplay. You need five cards to progress onto the next level. As the level increases so too does the complexity of your annotations as well as the number of annotations required per card. Each level also includes a tutorial showing you what to look for, so you learn as you go.
What You’ll Contribute To
The deep sea is a complex system; many factors can influence species’ diversity, distribution and behavior. With a continuous presence on the seafloor, cabled observatories like the NEPTUNE Canada network offer scientists unique opportunities to answer fundamental questions such as:
- What environmental factors influence the distribution of species in the deep?
- What is the biodiversity associated with deep-sea environments?
- How do species interact with each other and with their environment?
Animal Abundance & Diversity in Barkley Canyon
The Barkley Canyon videos currently in Digital Fishers are part of a larger research project looking at the influence of food supply (detritus that falls from the surface to the deep) on species abundance and diversity at the ocean floor. We know this supply of organic matter changes in quality and quantity with seasons, but how those variations affect the organisms living on the seafloor?
The Barkley Canyon area is also affected by large seasonal changes in oxygen concentration. How these changes influence animal communities is still not understood. By watching and annotating the videos with Digital Fishers, you can help tell researchers about the types of animals inhabiting a study area at different times.
Marine Life on a Mid-Ocean Ridge
Corals and other creatures are found distributed in patches along the ridge, but what can their locations and growth patterns tell us about this unique environment? A team of scientists across Canada are trying to answer this question by comparing the level of biodiversity in a location to the complexity of the rock structures on the seafloor. Do complex habitats provide homes for more species?
By using Digital Fishers to annotate videos from the mid-ocean ridge, you can help researchers better catalogue the variety and abundance of sea life found on these rock structures.
Donate 15 Seconds (many times!) to a Good Cause
Volunteer contributions are the key ingredient that will make Digital Fishers useful to scientists. We hope you’ll give it a try—your contributions will help scientists better understand the oceans—and you’ll gain some knowledge in a fun way too.
Additional Links:









Sterling Bjorndahl said:
This is for your web developers.
The site does not work when I use the hosts file from http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm, which protects against malware and ads. This usually means your scripts are halting instead of gracefully timing out when they can’t contact a certain host, probably the addthis.com group.
I can comment out the addthis.com entries in the mvps hosts file, but since it gets updated monthly or so, it would add work. I would like to ask that you consider changing your scripts so they don’t halt for those of us who block addthis.com.
Thanks,
Sterling
jodiewalsh said:
Hi Sterling,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Yes, the developers did notice similar problems from an Ad Blocking extension they installed and fixed this; however, the code did not make it to production with the last release. It is on the list of revisions.
Depending on the timing of our next release, hopefully, we can get this fixed fairly quickly. Thanks again for passing the information on.
Best,
Jodie
Julie Mulligan said:
I am enjoying being a volunteer scanner of the videos. Two things about the video page. One, the tutorials do not work. I have had to resort to Flickr photos of the project to help me identify features and creatures, with extra help from the internet. Not sure what the tutorials had, but it would have been nice to have a bit more information. The information in the cards is too microscopic to be of assistance in video identification. Secondly, the right side of the screen is cut off. The cards and level information cannot be viewed.
jodiewalsh said:
Hello Julie
It is wonderful to hear you are enjoying being a Digital Fisher. Thank you for your comments and for volunteering your time. I have copied your comments in italics and popped some responses below:
Tutorials do not work. Not sure what the tutorials had, but it would have been nice to have a bit more information.
• I am not sure what web browser you are using; but sometimes the tutorials look a little different when using Internet Explorer. When you click on the tutorials on the left are you also clicking on the word descriptions? There you will find pictures of the creatures you may see in the video.
• We have discussed the possibility of a video tutorial and agree that the more guidance that we can offer will make not only the experience more enjoyable, but also the annotations more accurate.
The information in the cards is too microscopic to be of assistance in video identification.
• At the moment , the purpose of the cards is for educational fun. They are not necessarily connected to what you are seeing in the videos that are currently playing.
The right side of the screen is cut off. The cards and level information cannot be viewed.
• We have built the screen so it can fit a both large and small computers. You may need to adjust your screen slightly. If you try pressing Ctrl and the “-“ (dash) keys at the same time the system should adjust. To get larger again you can press Ctrl and the “+“ (plus) key.
I hope that helps a little. We describe ourselves as being in a perpetual beta mode and are constantly looking at ways to improve your experience. So, please feel free to contact me should you have further comments or questions.
All the best
Jodie
–
Jodie Walsh | Research Coordinator
University of Victoria
jodie@uvic.ca
Elizabeth Bigelow said:
Now that I have learned to click on the headings in the tutorial (duh!) I am learning more and feeling more comfortable about annotating. However, the tutorial would be much more useful if it could be left up on the screen and “parked” to one side so that it could be referred to while annotating. ERB
jodiewalsh said:
Hi Elizabeth,
I am glad you were able to find your way around the tutorial. It is a challenge to fit everything on one screen; but, I like the idea of having something handy at all times. Thanks for keeping in touch.
Jodie
–
Jodie Walsh | Research Coordinator
University of Victoria
Harold Smith said:
Tried to log in today. It wouldn’t let me for some reason. Gave up on using my normal password and went through the forgotten password routine. It sent me a password and the site still refuses to let me log in even with the new password. ???
Justin Longo said:
Hi – we’re really sorry to hear about these login troubles, but certainly appreciate you letting us know. Your comments have been posted in a support ticket and the systems people have just started working on this. We’ll follow up here when we have this resolved.
jodiewalsh said:
Hello – It looks like the login issue has been resolved. There was an upgrade yesterday, so it may have been down temporarily. Also, the CAS server that handles logins was upgraded, which could have also temporarily prevented anyone from logging in.
We have had several people logging back in this morning and things seems to be back on track. Today’s leader has recorded 75 annotations already!
Please let us know if you continue to experience problems.
Best,
Jodie
Harold Smith said:
Thanks for the help. Was finally able to log in this afternoon.
Harold
jodiewalsh said:
Wonderful Harold…thanks so much for your patience and especially for all the work you have been doing.
Jodie
Harold Smith said:
I’ve noticed that the series clips are repeating – that is, I’m expected to annotate something which I’ve already annotated previously. The few times the system tries to load anything past Dec 2010 it generally just hangs up and won’t load the clips.
Harold Smith
Dennis Hawn said:
I notice the repeat of the videos as well but use the repeats to fill in gaps due to multiple answers to categories with single annotations
Karla said:
For some reason I can not get annotations to save
I have tried over the last few days many times. I am able to watch the clips and I see them very well but when I stop them and choose each of the items listed then hit the save annotation it only flashes and never saves or gives me credit for it. wonder if anyone could help me fix this?
Thanks for your time
Justin Longo said:
Hi Karla – sorry for the long delay in responding to your question. Let me know if this is still a problem. If so, a first question is “what browser are you using”?
Joseph said:
I’m on level 3 and why I am seeing the same 15 second clips more than once. Why? I want to look at new things every time. Also, how do you look at 15 second clips that you have previously annotated? Is there a save option?
Thanks,
Joseph
Justin Longo said:
Hi Joseph – I agree, those are two things about Digital Fishers I don’t like either.
The answer to the first question is either “some 15 seconds look exactly the same as another 15 seconds”, or it’s like the Gourmet jelly bean problem: every time you reach into the bag, you somehow grab one of the terrible chocolate ones. (I’m assuming you’re clicking “Random” and not “Next Clip” when you want to see something different?)
The answer to the second question is: no, but I wish there was. This is on the version 2 list.
Thanks for fishing!
Justin
Mandy Hu said:
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am a researcher at the Centre for Science Communication at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. I am studying citizen science projects worldwide by characterizing their critical components and investigating how these components affect civic engagement. I have reviewed the website for your project and I hoped you could help me with my research by answering the 4 main questions (and their subsidiaries) below. The questions can be answered by email or, if preferred, by telephone/skype conversation. The duration of my study is limited and I would be very grateful if you could reply before the end of April.
1. Does the project aim for long term (e.g. multiple event) participation of citizens?
- If so, how many times and what time period is of importance?
- How is long term participation encouraged?
- How is long term participation monitored?
2. How is the data/information collected by citizens used by professional scientists? And how does it contribute to society?
- Are the results communicated back to the citizen scientist? If so, how?
- Are the results communicated with greater society? If so, how?
3. How is the success of your project defined and measured?
- How successful would you deem the project to-date, and by which indicators?
4. What do you feel are the ways that your project initiates and/or maintains civic engagement (positive behavior and attitude towards participation in science and society)?
- Does the project actively aim to promote civic engagement and are there indications of establishment of civic engagement (for example, positive behavior and attitude of citizens towards current and other citizen science projects, and further involvement of citizens in science and society)?
Your answers will be of great value to my study. Thank you in advance.
Yours faithfully,
Mandy Hu
Justin Longo said:
Hi Mandy – thanks for your post to the Digital Fishers blog. Here are our answers to your survey questions. We’d be pleased to receive the results of your research when completed.
1. Does the project aim for long term (e.g. multiple event) participation of citizens?
We are indifferent to whether people participate once or multiple times – that is, 1000 annotations by one participant is equivalent to 1000 different participants making one annotation each, except for three observations:
a. We speculate that increased participation marginally improves the accuracy of a participant’s observations (i.e., long term participation is better)
b. A diversity of perspectives that lead to agreement on annotations across multiple participants increases our confidence in the quality of those annotations (i.e., more participants is better)
c. We would generally prefer to have more people come to our project site and, once there, complete multiple annotations (i.e., the biggest challenge is getting participants so, once there, it is a “lower cost” problem to keep them there for a while)
- If so, how many times and what time period is of importance?
Despite our speculation that increased participation marginally improves the accuracy of a participant’s observations, we designed Digital Fishers so that a new participant can easily be effective on their first annotation.
- How is long term participation encouraged?
Three gamification elements are used: progress metres (users progress through the system’s five levels through their annotations); achievements (annotations earn users “collector cards”); and a leader board for the all time leader and the daily leader.
- How is long term participation monitored?
Each user has an account that is used to record their activity.
2. How is the data/information collected by citizens used by professional scientists? And how does it contribute to society?
Users help to filter and annotate video collected through the multiple video cameras on the NEPTUNE Canada cabled sea-floor observatory. This allows scientists to more efficiently allocate their time to higher-order scientific research and to avoid spending large amounts of time viewing the raw video themselves.
- Are the results communicated back to the citizen scientist? If so, how?
Results are communicated generally through the NEPTUNE Canada website and the Digital Fishers blog, but we do not currently communicate directly with participants.
- Are the results communicated with greater society? If so, how?
As above, through the NEPTUNE Canada and Digital Fishers websites.
3. How is the success of your project defined and measured?
Our principal measure is the number of registered users, the total number of annotations provided, the amount of video viewed and annotated, and measures of the number of annotations per user. We do not yet have formal measures of the value that scientists place on the annotated videos nor the use of that data in scientific research.
- How successful would you deem the project to-date, and by which indicators?
We are very pleased with the results to date in terms of the above measures (roughly 1400 unique users and approximately 100 000 annotations).
4. What do you feel are the ways that your project initiates and/or maintains civic engagement (positive behavior and attitude towards participation in science and society)?
Along with allowing participants to make a real contribution to an ongoing science endeavour, we hope that participants learn something about the seafloor environment.
- Does the project actively aim to promote civic engagement and are there indications of establishment of civic engagement (for example, positive behavior and attitude of citizens towards current and other citizen science projects, and further involvement of citizens in science and society)?
While this is an aim of the project, there are currently no resources available to further this objective. The maintenance of the Digital Fishers blog and related promotional efforts are undertaken through the volunteer efforts of former project members.